Finally the rebels made Richard promise to punish traitors. Richard and a small retinue rode out to meet Wat Tyler. The tax was three times what it had been in Enforcement proved difficult since manorial lords, lesser gentry, wealthy peasants, and towns all competed for the smaller labor supply, but attempts to enforce the law nevertheless occurred, making lawyers and government officials the objects of resentment while driving rural village leaders and urban labor leaders into alliance.
The crisis in London was over, but in the provinces the rebellion reached its climax in the following weeks. The most vociferous of their leaders, Walter, or "Wat" Tyler, was at the head of a contingent from Kent.
Their only hope was negotiation. In Kent and Hertfordshire, the gentry did not desire brutal punishment; nor did they appreciate royal justices whose visitations overrode their own authority. Financing the increasingly expensive and unsuccessful war with France was a major preoccupation.
They often got what they asked for: In June rebels from Essex and Kent marched toward London. In the wake of the plague peasants moved into towns, townspeople acquired land in the countryside, and the two economies, always interdependent, became permanently intertwined.
The Great Revolt of Charters in hand, they began to disperse homeward. Peasants and townspeople rose against royal agents in opposition to a poll tax the royal government had levied upon them. On 30th May, John Brampton attempted to collect the poll tax from villagers at Fobbing. His mother; his chancellor, Archbishop Sudbury; his treasurer, Hales; and William Walworth, mayor of London, also retreated to the Tower for protection.
The English Rising of Sources suggest that the royal party had acted deliberately, but whatever the case the revolt collapsed and the rebels returned home under guard. Faced with a potential shortfall of one-third of its poll tax revenue, the government ordered the tax assessors back into the field and appointed commissions composed of local landholders and lawyers to investigate instances of evasion and collect delinquent taxes.
The Statute attempted to curb this by pegging wages and restricting the mobility of labour, but the probable effect was that labourers employed by lords were effectively exempted, but labourers working for other employers, both artisans and more substantial peasants, were liable to be fined or held in the stocks.
Some executions occurred, but most rebels received fines as punishment. The next day the rebels stood defiant, bearing a royal standard and a banner of St.
On 2nd June, he was attacked at Brentwood. The rebellion lasted less than a month and failed completely as a social revolution. The royal party soon realized it was trapped.The Peasants Revolt, or laterly known as Wat Tyler's Rebellion was one of the biggest uprisings in history which happened in most large areas of England in The most familliar areas of which the uprising started included Kent and Essex, but the actual revolt occured in London.
Comparing The Peasants’ Revolt of With The Cade Rebellion of Essay - When looking at the Peasants’ Revolt of in comparison to the Cade Rebellion ofthere are many apparent explanations as to why the. The peasants revolt in England Essay by timmeh, College, Undergraduate, A+, April download word file, 6 pages download word file, /5(2).
The Peasants' Revolt, TylerвЂ™s Rebellion, or the Great Rising of was one of a number of popular revolts in late medieval Europe and is a major event in the history of England. The names of some of its leaders, John Ball, Wat Tyler and Jack Straw, are still familiar even though very little is actually known about these individuals/5(1).
The Peasants' Revolt took place in and is a major event in the history of England. An army of peasants from Kent and Essex marched on London. They did something noone had done before or since - they captured the Tower of London.5/5(1).
Peasants’ Revolt Essay In the early summer of a series of protests and revolts erupted across England. Peasants and townspeople rose against royal agents in opposition to a poll tax the royal government had levied upon them.Download